|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-562||5th Cir.||Oct 9, 2013||Dec 3, 2013||9-0||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: The district court had jurisdiction to determine whether the partnerships’ lack of economic substance could justify imposing a valuation-misstatement penalty on the partners.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on December 3, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 6 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2012)|
|Dec 19 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Jan 4 2013||Response Requested . (Due February 4, 2013)|
|Feb 4 2013||Brief of respondents Gary Woods, as Tax Matters Partner of Tesoro Drive Partners, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 20 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013.|
|Feb 20 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 22, 2013.|
|Mar 25 2013||Petition GRANTED. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether the district court had jurisdiction in this case under 26 U. S. C. §6226 to consider the substantial valuation misstatement penalty.|
|Apr 4 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 30, 2013.|
|Apr 4 2013||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 22, 2013.|
|May 30 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|May 30 2013||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Jun 5 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Amandeep S. Grewal in support of neither party filed.|
|Jul 19 2013||Brief of respondents Gary Woods, as Tax Matters Partner of Tesoro Drive Partners, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 22 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 9, 2013.|
|Jul 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Professor David J. Shakow filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amici curiae of Gordon W. Bush, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amici curiae of New Millennium Trading, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amici curiae of Scott and Audrey Blum filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Partners in Jade Trading, LLC, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Aug 2 2013||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 5th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Aug 2 2013||Record received from U.S.D.C. for Western District of Texas is electronic.|
|Aug 19 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 8 2013||Letter and attachments dated October 7, 2013 received from counsel for respondents. (Distributed)|
|Oct 9 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Gregory G. Garre, Washington, D. C.|
|Oct 28 2013||Exhibits received from the U.S.D.C. for the Western District of Texas San Antonio Division. (Three boxes)|
|Dec 3 2013||Judgment REVERSED Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 6 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jan 15 2014||Record from U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas (San Antonio) has been returned.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.