|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-1459||4th Cir.||Dec 7, 2021||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2021|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 14 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)|
|Apr 30 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 17, 2021 to May 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 03 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 21, 2021.|
|May 21 2021||Brief of respondent Justin Eugene Taylor in opposition filed.|
|May 21 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Justin Eugene Taylor.|
|Jun 07 2021||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 08 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
|Jul 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.|
|Jul 02 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jul 02 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 19 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Jul 19 2021||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 21 2021||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 7, 20201. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 22, 2021.|
|Aug 23 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Sep 07 2021||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Sep 20 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 7, 2021.|
|Sep 27 2021||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Oct 04 2021||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Virginia is electronic and located on Pacer. Some transcripts and Sealed documents has been received (One Envelope)|
|Oct 22 2021||Brief of respondent Justin Eugene Taylor filed.|
|Oct 27 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 29 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Neal Goldfarb filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2021||Brief amicus curiae of John Pangelinan filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2021||Brief amicus curiae of First Amendment Clinic filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2021||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and FAMM filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2021||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 07 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Rebecca Taibleson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Washington, D. C.|
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.