|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-420||9th Cir.||Apr 19, 2016||Jun 13, 2016||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2015|
Holding: The use of tribal-court convictions as predicate offenses in a subsequent prosecution does not violate the Constitution when the tribal-court convictions occurred in proceedings that complied with the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 and were therefore valid when entered.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 13, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 5 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2015)|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Michael Bryant, Jr.|
|Nov 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Nov 23 2015||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 14 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Dec 14 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 28 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed.)|
|Jan 28 2016||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of Dennis K. Burke, United States Attorney, District of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Feb 19 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 7, 2016.|
|Mar 4 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016|
|Mar 7 2016||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. filed.|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Criminal Justice Organizations and Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Professor Barbara Creel, and The Tribal Defender Network filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Mar 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 15 2016||The record from U.S.D.C. District of Montana is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of one document.|
|Mar 23 2016||The record from the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Apr 6 2016||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 19 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Steven C. Babcock, Assistant Federal Defender, Billings, Mont.|
|Jun 13 2016||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jun 30 2016||Letter from the United States received.|
|Jul 15 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...