|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-420||9th Cir.||Apr 19, 2016||Jun 13, 2016||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2015|
Holding: The use of tribal-court convictions as predicate offenses in a subsequent prosecution does not violate the Constitution when the tribal-court convictions occurred in proceedings that complied with the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 and were therefore valid when entered.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 13, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 5 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2015)|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Michael Bryant, Jr.|
|Nov 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Nov 23 2015||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 14 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Dec 14 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 28 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed.)|
|Jan 28 2016||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of Dennis K. Burke, United States Attorney, District of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Feb 19 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 7, 2016.|
|Mar 4 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016|
|Mar 7 2016||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. filed.|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Criminal Justice Organizations and Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Professor Barbara Creel, and The Tribal Defender Network filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Mar 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 15 2016||The record from U.S.D.C. District of Montana is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of one document.|
|Mar 23 2016||The record from the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Apr 6 2016||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 19 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Steven C. Babcock, Assistant Federal Defender, Billings, Mont.|
|Jun 13 2016||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jun 30 2016||Letter from the United States received.|
|Jul 15 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.