|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-420||9th Cir.||Apr 19, 2016||Jun 13, 2016||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2015|
Holding: The use of tribal-court convictions as predicate offenses in a subsequent prosecution does not violate the Constitution when the tribal-court convictions occurred in proceedings that complied with the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 and were therefore valid when entered.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 13, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 5 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2015)|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Michael Bryant, Jr.|
|Nov 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Nov 23 2015||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 14 2015||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Dec 14 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 28 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed.)|
|Jan 28 2016||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief amici curiae of Dennis K. Burke, United States Attorney, District of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Feb 19 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 7, 2016.|
|Mar 4 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016|
|Mar 7 2016||Brief of respondent Michael Bryant, Jr. filed.|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Criminal Justice Organizations and Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Professor Barbara Creel, and The Tribal Defender Network filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Mar 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 15 2016||The record from U.S.D.C. District of Montana is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of one document.|
|Mar 23 2016||The record from the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Apr 6 2016||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 19 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Steven C. Babcock, Assistant Federal Defender, Billings, Mont.|
|Jun 13 2016||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jun 30 2016||Letter from the United States received.|
|Jul 15 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/