Breaking News

Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg

Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-453 Cal. Ct. App. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel on a cert.-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.

Issue: Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Sep 21 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)
Oct 25 2021Brief amicus curiae of the Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
Nov 09 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
Nov 10 2021Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2021)
Dec 03 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 06 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
Jan 10 2022Response to petition from respondent Johnathon Gregg filed.
Jan 12 2022Letter from petitioners dated January 12, 2022 filed in reply to the response to the petition for certiorari.
Jan 26 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
Jun 21 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
Jun 27 2022Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
Jul 29 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED