|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-547||9th Cir.||Nov 2, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, by incorporating the deliberative process privilege, protects against compelled disclosure of a federal agency’s draft documents that were prepared as part of a formal interagency consultation process under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and that concerned a proposed agency action that was later modified in the consultation process.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 16 2019||Application (19A185) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 28, 2019 to September 27, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Aug 19 2019||Application (19A185) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 27, 2019.|
|Sep 17 2019||Application (19A185) to extend further the time from September 27, 2019 to October 25, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 17 2019||Application (19A185) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 25, 2019.|
|Oct 25 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2019)|
|Nov 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 27, 2019 to January 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 06 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2020.|
|Jan 06 2020||Brief of respondent Sierra Club, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Jan 22 2020||Reply of petitioners United States Fish and Wildlife Service,, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 13 2020||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Mar 16 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including May 18, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2020.|
|Apr 09 2020||Motion for a further extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Apr 21 2020||Motion to further extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is further extended to and including May 21, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 27, 2020.|
|May 21 2020||Brief of petitioners United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al. filed.|
|May 21 2020||Joint appendix filed.|
|Jun 02 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Sierra Club, Inc.|
|Jul 27 2020||Brief of respondent Sierra Club, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 31 2020||Brief amici curiae of Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife filed.|
|Aug 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center filed.|
|Aug 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of American Forest Resource Council, et al. filed.|
|Aug 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 28 Media Organizations filed.|
|Aug 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of ACLU, et al. filed.|
|Aug 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Andrew Rosenberg, et al. filed.|
|Aug 19 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 2, 2020.|
|Aug 26 2020||Reply of petitioners United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al. filed.|
|Aug 31 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Sep 02 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 03 2020||Record from the U.S.C.A. is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Sep 28 2020||Sealed record material from USCA-9 received (electronic).|
|Nov 02 2020||Argued. For petitioners: Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Sanjay Narayan, Oakland, Cal.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.