|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-635||2d Cir.||May 12, 2020||Jul 9, 2020||7-2||Roberts||OT 2019|
Holding: Article II and the supremacy clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president.
Judgment: Affirmed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on July 9, 2020. Justice Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 14 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2019)|
|Nov 21 2019||Brief of respondents Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as district attorney of the County of New York,et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 21 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Mazars USA LLP to respond filed.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 25 2019||Reply of petitioner Donald Trump filed.|
|Nov 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Christian Family Coalition (CFC) Florida, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 13 2019||Petition GRANTED. The case will set for argument in the March 2020 argument session.|
|Jan 08 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Donald Trump|
|Jan 15 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Mazars USA LLP.|
|Jan 15 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York.|
|Jan 21 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Donald Trump.|
|Jan 27 2020||Brief of petitioner Donald J. Trump filed.|
|Jan 31 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 31, 2020.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed. (Also in 19-715 & 19-760) VIDED.|
|Feb 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Christian Family Coalition (CFC) Florida, Inc. filed. (Also in 19-715 & 19-760) VIDED.|
|Feb 05 2020||Letter of respondent Mazars USA LLP notifying the Clerk that it does not intend to participate in this case filed. (Also in 19-715 & 19-760). VIDED|
|Feb 19 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 19 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.|
|Feb 19 2020||The record received from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit has been electronically filed.|
|Feb 20 2020||Sealed documents sent from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit are electronically filed.|
|Feb 24 2020||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Feb 26 2020||Brief of respondent Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his Official Capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 26 2020||Sealed document sent by the U.S.D.C Southern District of New York. (1-Envelope)|
|Mar 02 2020||Brief amici curiae of Former Republican Members of Congress, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Boston University Law Professors Sean J. Kealy and James J. Wheaton filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Washington State Tax Practitioners filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Former Department of Justice Officials filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union, and The New York Civil Liberties Union filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Commonwealth of Virginia, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amici curiae of Claire Finkelstein and the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law at the University of Pennsylvania filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 04 2020||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 04 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Eugene H. Goldberg filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 16 2020||ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED.|
|Mar 23 2020||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Mar 27 2020||Reply of petitioner Donald J. Trump filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 13 2020||Argument to be rescheduled for May 2020.|
|Apr 15 2020||RESCHEDULED FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, May 12, 2020.|
|May 12 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Jay A. Sekulow, Washington, D. C.; and Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Carey R. Dunne, General Counsel, New York County District Attorney's Office, New York, N. Y.|
|Jul 09 2020||Judgment is AFFIRMED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Thomas, J., and Alito, J., filed dissenting opinions.|
|Jul 15 2020||Application (20A17) of Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in his official capacity as district attorney of the County of New York, for an order to issue the judgment forthwith, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 17 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED (forthwith).|
|Jul 17 2020||Application (20A17) granted by The Chief Justice.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.