|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether a records request from the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol violates the Constitution or laws of the United States, entitling former President Donald Trump to a preliminary injunction prohibiting production of the records to the committee.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 23 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 24, 2022)|
|Dec 23 2021||Application (21A272) for a stay pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 23 2021||Motion for expedited consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by respondents.|
|Dec 29 2021||Supplemental brief of petitioner Donald J. Trump filed.|
|Dec 29 2021||Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Former Executive Branch Lawyers.|
|Dec 30 2021||Brief of Executive Branch Respondents in opposition filed.|
|Dec 30 2021||Response to application from Executive Branch Respondents filed.|
|Dec 30 2021||Brief of respondents Bennie G. Thompson and the House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol in opposition filed.|
|Dec 30 2021||Response to application from respondents Bennie G. Thompson and the House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol filed.|
|Jan 04 2022||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by States United Democracy Center and Former Federal, State, and Local Officials.|
|Jan 05 2022||Amicus brief of Government Accountability Project, Government Information Watch, National Security Counselors, Louis Fisher, Heidi Kitrosser, Mark J. Rozell, Jonathan Shaub, and Mitchel A. Sollenberger submitted.|
|Jan 07 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Former White House Chief of Staff Mark R. Meadows filed.|
|Jan 11 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Jack Jordan filed.|
|Jan 11 2022||Amicus brief of America First Legal Foundation submitted.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.