|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19A60||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 12 2019||Application (19A60) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jul 12 2019||Response to application (19A60) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, July 19, 2019, by 4 p.m. ET.|
|Jul 19 2019||Response to application from respondents Sierra Club, et al. filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California, et al.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by U.S. House of Representatives.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Tohono O'odham Nation.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Rep. Andy Barr.|
|Jul 22 2019||Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.|
|Jul 26 2019||Application (19A60) referred to the Court.|
|Jul 26 2019||Application (19A60) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. Among the reasons is that the Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage that the plaintiffs have no cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary’s compliance with Section 8005. The District Court’s June 28, 2019 order granting a permanent injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, and JUSTICE KAGAN would deny the application. JUSTICE BREYER, concurring in part and dissenting inpart from grant of stay. (Detached Opinion)|
|Jul 22 2020||Motion to lift stay filed by Sierra Club, et al.|
|Jul 23 2020||Response to motion requested, due Wednesday, July 29, by 4 p.m. ET.|
|Jul 24 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by United States House of Representatives.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by U.S. Rep. Andy Barr.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Federal Courts Scholars.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Former Members of Congress.|
|Jul 29 2020||Response to motion from Trump, President of U.S., et al. filed.|
|Jul 30 2020||Reply of Sierra Club, et al. filed.|
|Jul 31 2020||The motion to lift stay is denied. JUSTICE BREYER, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, and JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from denial of motion to lift stay. (Detached Opinion).|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.