Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Monday, the Supreme Court released additional orders from the October 18 conference. The justices did not add any new cases to their merits docket.

Trump v. Sierra Club

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19A60 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jul 12 2019Application (19A60) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Jul 12 2019Response to application (19A60) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, July 19, 2019, by 4 p.m. ET.
Jul 19 2019Response to application from respondents Sierra Club, et al. filed.
Jul 19 2019Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California, et al.
Jul 19 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by U.S. House of Representatives.
Jul 19 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Tohono O'odham Nation.
Jul 19 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Rep. Andy Barr.
Jul 22 2019Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
Jul 26 2019Application (19A60) referred to the Court.
Jul 26 2019Application (19A60) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. Among the reasons is that the Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage that the plaintiffs have no cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary’s compliance with Section 8005. The District Court’s June 28, 2019 order granting a permanent injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, and JUSTICE KAGAN would deny the application. JUSTICE BREYER, concurring in part and dissenting inpart from grant of stay. (Detached Opinion)
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards