|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19A60||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 12 2019||Application (19A60) for a stay pending appeal, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jul 12 2019||Response to application (19A60) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, July 19, 2019, by 4 p.m. ET.|
|Jul 19 2019||Response to application from respondents Sierra Club, et al. filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California, et al.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by U.S. House of Representatives.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Tohono O'odham Nation.|
|Jul 19 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Rep. Andy Barr.|
|Jul 22 2019||Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.|
|Jul 26 2019||Application (19A60) referred to the Court.|
|Jul 26 2019||Application (19A60) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. Among the reasons is that the Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage that the plaintiffs have no cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary’s compliance with Section 8005. The District Court’s June 28, 2019 order granting a permanent injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, and JUSTICE KAGAN would deny the application. JUSTICE BREYER, concurring in part and dissenting inpart from grant of stay. (Detached Opinion)|
|Jul 22 2020||Motion to lift stay filed by Sierra Club, et al.|
|Jul 23 2020||Response to motion requested, due Wednesday, July 29, by 4 p.m. ET.|
|Jul 24 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by United States House of Representatives.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by U.S. Rep. Andy Barr.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Federal Courts Scholars.|
|Jul 28 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Former Members of Congress.|
|Jul 29 2020||Response to motion from Trump, President of U.S., et al. filed.|
|Jul 30 2020||Reply of Sierra Club, et al. filed.|
|Jul 31 2020||The motion to lift stay is denied. JUSTICE BREYER, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, and JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from denial of motion to lift stay. (Detached Opinion).|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.