|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1096||2d Cir.||Nov 3, 2015||May 19, 2016||5-3||Kagan||OT 2015|
Holding: A state offense counts as an "aggravated felony" for purposes of Section 1101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which contains a long list of offenses that can render a non-citizen deportable and further specifies that an offense listed in the statute is an aggravated felony whether it is in violation of federal, state, or foreign law, when it has every element of a listed federal crime except one requiring a connection to interstate or foreign commerce.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-3, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on May 19, 2016. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Breyer joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 13 2015||Application (14A770) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 5, 2015 to March 9, 2015, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.|
|Jan 16 2015||Application (14A770) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until March 9, 2015.|
|Mar 9 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2015)|
|Apr 2 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 11, 2015.|
|May 6 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 18, 2015.|
|May 18 2015||Brief of respondent Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General in opposition filed.|
|May 27 2015||Reply of petitioner Jorge Luna Torres filed.|
|Jun 2 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2015.|
|Jun 22 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.|
|Jun 29 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 9 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 18, 2015.|
|Jul 9 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 22, 2015.|
|Jul 16 2015||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Jorge Luna Torres.|
|Aug 18 2015||Brief of petitioner Jorge Luna Torres filed.|
|Aug 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Aug 25 2015||Brief amici curiae of National Immigrant Justice Center, et al. filed.|
|Aug 28 2015||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Sep 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 3, 2015|
|Sep 10 2015||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.|
|Sep 16 2015||Record received from U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit is electronic.|
|Sep 22 2015||Brief of respondent Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General filed.|
|Sep 29 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 14 2015||Reply of petitioner Jorge Luna Torres filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 3 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Matthew L. Guadagno, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Elaine J. Goldenberg, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|May 19 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Breyer, JJ., joined.|
|Jun 20 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...