|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether state law may nullify the federal “patient safety work product” privilege, or whether, instead, the Kentucky Supreme Court erred by interpreting it not to protect information “normally contained in” documents subject to state reporting or recordkeeping requirements. CVSG: 05/24/2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 18 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2015)|
|Apr 20 2015||Brief amici curiae of University Healthsystem Safety Intelligence PSO, et al. filed.|
|Apr 20 2015||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Hospital Association, et al.|
|Apr 20 2015||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Joint Commission.|
|Apr 20 2015||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Alliance for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.|
|May 5 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.|
|May 13 2015||Response Requested . (Due June 12, 2015)|
|Jul 7 2015||In light of the letter received from Miller K. Carter, Esq., dated July 7, 2015, the time to file a response to the petition has been extended to and including August 21, 2015.|
|Aug 21 2015||Brief of respondent Estate of Luvetta Goff in opposition filed.|
|Sep 8 2015||Reply of petitioners Phillip Tibbs, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 5 2015||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 24 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 6 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioners Phillip Tibbs, et al. filed.|
|Jun 7 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Hospital Association, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jun 27 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Joint Commission GRANTED.|
|Jun 27 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Alliance for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety GRANTED.|
|Jun 27 2016||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.