|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-376||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether, when a party mistakenly but timely files a case in a forum that lacks jurisdiction, that can ever support equitably tolling the statute of limitations.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 09 2019||Application (19A160) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2019 to October 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Aug 09 2019||Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filng system.|
|Aug 12 2019||Application (19A160) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until September 19, 2019.|
|Sep 19 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2019)|
|Oct 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 23, 2019 to November 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 22, 2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 22, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 19 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||Brief of respondent Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 23 2019||Reply of petitioner Dennis Thompson filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Biden's student-debt relief plan. The justices will hear oral argument in February. In the meantime, the plan remains blocked as a result of lower-court rulings.
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.