|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-6166||4th Cir.||Feb 23, 2016||Jun 20, 2016||7-1||Alito||OT 2015|
Holding: Because the Hobbs Act criminalizes robberies and attempted robberies that affect any commerce “over which the U.S. has jurisdiction,’ the prosecution in a Hobbs Act robbery case satisfies the act's commerce element if it shows that the defendant robbed or attempted to rob a drug dealer of drugs or drug proceeds.
Judgment: Affirmed, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 20, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 4 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2014)|
|Sep 30 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 10, 2014.|
|Nov 7 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 10, 2014.|
|Dec 8 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 9, 2015.|
|Jan 5 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 17, 2015.|
|Feb 18 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 19, 2015.|
|Mar 17 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 20, 2015.|
|Apr 20 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 20, 2015.|
|May 20 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 3, 2015.|
|Jun 3 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 6, 2015.|
|Jul 6 2015||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jul 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 1 2015||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Nov 12 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 30, 2015.|
|Nov 12 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 13, 2016.|
|Nov 30 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Nov 30 2015||Supplemental joint appendix volume filed.|
|Nov 30 2015||Brief of petitioner David Anthony Taylor filed.|
|Dec 23 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 23, 2016|
|Jan 4 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Jan 8 2016||Record recieved from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of a SEALED appendix Volume III, which is also electronic.|
|Jan 13 2016||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Jan 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Feb 12 2016||Reply of petitioner David Anthony Taylor filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 23 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Dennis E. Jones, Abingdon, Va. For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.|
|Jun 20 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jul 22 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.