|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-8976||D.C. Cir.||Nov 6, 2012||Jan 9, 2013||9-0||Scalia||OT 2012|
Holding: A defendant bears the burden of proving a defense of withdrawal from conspiracy.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 9, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 27 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2012)|
|Mar 22 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 30, 2012.|
|Apr 25 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 14, 2012.|
|May 14 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 29 2012||Reply of petitioner Calvin Smith and John Raynor filed. (Distributed)|
|May 30 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 14, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question II presented by the petition.|
|Jul 17 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2012.|
|Jul 17 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 5, 2012.|
|Jul 17 2012||Counsel for the petitioner agrees to file any reply brief on the merits on or before October 26, 2012.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 6, 2012|
|Aug 20 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 20 2012||Brief of petitioners Calvin Smith and John Raynor filed.|
|Aug 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for District of Columbia Circuit. (3 boxes)|
|Aug 31 2012||Record received from U.S.D.C. for District of Columbia. (26 boxes)|
|Oct 5 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 26 2012||Reply of petitioners Calvin Smith and John Raynor filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 6 2012||Argued. For petitioners: A. J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Sarah E. Harrington, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 9 2013||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 11 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Apr 3 2013||Record returned to U.S.C.A. for District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Apr 3 2013||Record returned to U.S.D.C. for the District of Columbia.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.