|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-892||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.
Issue: Whether and to what extent the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment entitles a condemned inmate to timely notice of the method by which he will be executed.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 27 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2014)|
|Jan 27 2014||Application (13A778) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Scalia.|
|Jan 28 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jan 28 2014||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Allen S. Keller, M.D., et al.|
|Jan 29 2014||Letter from counsel for petitioner dated January 29, 2014, received. (Distributed)|
|Jan 30 2014||Supplemental brief of applicant Christopher Sepulvado filed.|
|Jan 31 2014||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales.|
|Feb 3 2014||Second Supplemental brief of applicant Christopher Sepulvado filed.|
|Feb 5 2014||Letter from counsel for applicant dated February 5, 2014, withdrawing application (13A778) for stay of execution received.|
|Feb 24 2014||February 24 supplemental brief of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed.|
|Feb 25 2014||Brief of respondent Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana in opposition filed.|
|Mar 11 2014||Reply of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed.|
|Mar 12 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 28, 2014.|
|Mar 27 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 4, 2014.|
|Apr 7 2014||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Allen S. Keller, M.D., et al. GRANTED.|
|Apr 7 2014||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales GRANTED.|
|Apr 7 2014||Petition DENIED.|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...