Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-892 | 5th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2013 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.
Issue: Whether and to what extent the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment entitles a condemned inmate to timely notice of the method by which he will be executed.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jan 27 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2014) |
Jan 27 2014 | Application (13A778) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Scalia. |
Jan 28 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. |
Jan 28 2014 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Allen S. Keller, M.D., et al. |
Jan 29 2014 | Letter from counsel for petitioner dated January 29, 2014, received. (Distributed) |
Jan 30 2014 | Supplemental brief of applicant Christopher Sepulvado filed. |
Jan 31 2014 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales. |
Feb 3 2014 | Second Supplemental brief of applicant Christopher Sepulvado filed. |
Feb 5 2014 | Letter from counsel for applicant dated February 5, 2014, withdrawing application (13A778) for stay of execution received. |
Feb 24 2014 | February 24 supplemental brief of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed. |
Feb 25 2014 | Brief of respondent Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana in opposition filed. |
Mar 11 2014 | Reply of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed. |
Mar 12 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 28, 2014. |
Mar 27 2014 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Christopher Sepulvado filed. (Distributed) |
Mar 31 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 4, 2014. |
Apr 7 2014 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Allen S. Keller, M.D., et al. GRANTED. |
Apr 7 2014 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales GRANTED. |
Apr 7 2014 | Petition DENIED. |
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
www.scotusblog.com
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.