|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-969||Fed. Cir.||Nov 27, 2017||Apr 24, 2018||5-4||Gorsuch||OT 2017|
Holding: When the United States Patent and Trademark Office institutes an inter partes review to reconsider an already-issued patent claim, under 35 U. S. C. §§311–319, it must decide the patentability of all of the claims the petitioner has challenged.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on April 24, 2018. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg and Sotomayor joined, and in which Justice Kagan joined except as to Part III-A.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 31 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2017)|
|Feb 28 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 5, 2017.|
|Apr 05 2017||Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.|
|Apr 17 2017||Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Apr 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.|
|May 15 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.|
|May 22 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 22 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2017.|
|Jun 22 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 5, 2017.|
|Jul 20 2017||Joint appendix filed. (2 Volumes) (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 20 2017||Brief of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Jul 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.|
|Sep 05 2017||Brief of Federal Respondent filed.|
|Sep 05 2017||Brief of respondent ComplementSoft, LLC filed.|
|Sep 12 2017||Motion for divided argument filed by respondent ComplementSoft, LLC.|
|Sep 12 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Houston Intellectual Property Law Association filed.|
|Oct 05 2017||Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Oct 06 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, November 27, 2017|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion for divided argument filed by respondent DENIED.|
|Oct 12 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.|
|Oct 18 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Nov 27 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Gregory A. Castanias, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Apr 24 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined, and in which Kagan, J., joined except as to Part III-A.|
|May 29 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Incidentally, Gorsuch had been scheduled to give a speech at the University of Wyoming today, but his visit was canceled due to COVID.
Nothing from Kagan or Gorsuch though 😢 https://twitter.com/scotusblog/status/1438530948207874050
💥 Breyer continues book tour (including @colbertlateshow two nights ago).
💥 Barrett gave a speech Sunday @uofl.
💥 Thomas is slated to give the 2021 Tocqueville Lecture today @NotreDame (but, like Barrett's speech, there is apparently no livestream).
Can modern art shed new light on landmark Supreme Court rulings? A recent book says yes. Artist Xavier Cortada created 10 paintings depicting SCOTUS cases, and scholars used the paintings to re-examine each case's legacy. Here's @amanda_frost1's review:
The art of justice: Re-examining landmark Supreme Court cases through expressionist paintings - SCOTUSblog
Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Consti...
NEW: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow on Biden's nomination of Elizabeth Prelogar to be solicitor general, the federal government's top lawyer at the Supreme Court.
In separate remarks on Sunday, two justices argued that SCOTUS is not a political body.
Justice Barrett did so in a speech in Kentucky, after being introduced by Mitch McConnell:
Justice Breyer did so in an interview on Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-political-reforms
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concerns Sunday that the public may incre...
SCOTUS provides instructions to the parties in the case of John Ramirez, the death-row inmate who has requested that his pastor be permitted to lay hands on him and pray out loud in the death chamber.
#SCOTUS issued a Friday-night order outlining specific questions for inmate John Ramirez & Texas to address in their briefing in his case, which is scheduled for argument in November. The Court put Ramirez's execution on hold earlier this week: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/091021zr_ap6c.pdf