|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-969||Fed. Cir.||Nov 27, 2017||Apr 24, 2018||5-4||Gorsuch||OT 2017|
Holding: When the United States Patent and Trademark Office institutes an inter partes review to reconsider an already-issued patent claim, under 35 U. S. C. §§311–319, it must decide the patentability of all of the claims the petitioner has challenged.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on April 24, 2018. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg and Sotomayor joined, and in which Justice Kagan joined except as to Part III-A.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 31 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2017)|
|Feb 28 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 5, 2017.|
|Apr 05 2017||Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.|
|Apr 17 2017||Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Apr 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.|
|May 15 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.|
|May 22 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 22 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2017.|
|Jun 22 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 5, 2017.|
|Jul 20 2017||Joint appendix filed. (2 Volumes) (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 20 2017||Brief of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Jul 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.|
|Sep 05 2017||Brief of Federal Respondent filed.|
|Sep 05 2017||Brief of respondent ComplementSoft, LLC filed.|
|Sep 12 2017||Motion for divided argument filed by respondent ComplementSoft, LLC.|
|Sep 12 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Houston Intellectual Property Law Association filed.|
|Oct 05 2017||Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.|
|Oct 06 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, November 27, 2017|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion for divided argument filed by respondent DENIED.|
|Oct 12 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.|
|Oct 18 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Nov 27 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Gregory A. Castanias, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Apr 24 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined, and in which Kagan, J., joined except as to Part III-A.|
|May 29 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.