|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Apr 19, 2021
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 08 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)|
|Sep 08 2020||Corrected appendix to the petition (submitted February 18, 2021).|
|Sep 11 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2020 to November 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 12, 2020.|
|Oct 26 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2020 to December 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 28 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2020.|
|Dec 09 2020||Brief for the Respondents filed.|
|Dec 11 2020||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|Dec 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 05 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jose Santos Sanchez, et al.|
|Feb 05 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Jose Santos Sanchez, et al.|
|Feb 22 2021||Brief of petitioners Jose Santos Sanchez, et al. filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Oxfam America filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Immigration Law Professors filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Human Rights Watch and Alianza Americas filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of District of Columbia, et al. filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Professors Alan Morrison and Brian Wolfman filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of American Immigration Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of National Immigration Litigation Alliance, American Civil Liberties Union, and Northwest Immigrant Rights Project filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Harvard TPS Coalition filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of 22 Cities and Counties filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Amicus brief of Service Employees International Union, et al. not accepted for filing. (March 03, 2021 - certificate of compliance to be corrected).|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Service Employees International Union and Other Labor Unions filed. (March 23, 2021)|
|Mar 10 2021||Corrected certificate of service for amicus curiae Harvard TPS Coalition filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 19, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record received from the U.S.D.C. 3rd Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer, with the exception of confidential documents that been electronically filed.|
|Mar 24 2021||Brief of respondents Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed.|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 09 2021||Reply of petitioner Jose Santos Sanchez, et ux. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 19 2021||Argued. For petitioners: Amy M. Saharia, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Michael R. Huston, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.