Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Rothgery v. Gillespie County

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-440 5th Cir. Mar 17, 2008
Tr.Aud.
Jun 23, 2008 8-1 Souter OT 2007

Holding: A criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Attachment does not also require that a prosecutor (as distinct from a police officer) be aware of that initial proceeding or involved in its conduct.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice David Souter on June 23, 2008. Chief Justice Roberts filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Scalia joined. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Scalia joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits briefs (Via ABA)

Amicus briefs

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards