Breaking News

Robertson v. Intratek Computer, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on May 16, 2022
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1229 5th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issues: (1) Whether mandatory compelled arbitration of claims under 41 U.S.C. § 4712 disrupts the administrative scheme set up by Congress to remedy and enforce violations of 41 U.S.C. § 4712; and (2) whether Congress intended to prohibit enforcement of mandatory employment arbitration agreements in 41 U.S.C. § 4712, even if the statute does not expressly refer to arbitration, when it (a) expressly provided for a federal trial in the remedy and enforcement section and (b) expressly prohibited waiver of any rights and remedies provided as a condition of employment. CVSG: 4/11/2022

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Mar 01 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)
Apr 21 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
May 03 2021Response Requested. (Due June 2, 2021)
May 26 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 2, 2021 to July 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
May 27 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 2, 2021.
Jul 02 2021Brief of respondent Intratek Computer, Incorporated in opposition filed.
Jul 20 2021Reply of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
Jul 21 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
Oct 04 2021The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Apr 11 2022Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Apr 22 2022Supplemental brief of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
Apr 26 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
May 16 2022Petition DENIED.