|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1547||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether operation of a “stay-put” provision in 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j) – which requires that a child whose educational program under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is under dispute to remain in his or her then-current placement while statutory “proceedings” to resolve the dispute are pending – terminates upon entry of a final judgment by a state or federal trial court in favor of the school district, as the D.C. and Sixth Circuits have held, or whether it continues until completion of any subsequent appeal of that judgment, as the Third and Ninth Circuits have held. CVSG: 4/10/2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 7 2014||Application (13A1109) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 21, 2014 to June 20, 2014, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|May 9 2014||Application (13A1109) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 20, 2014.|
|Jun 20 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 28, 2014)|
|Jul 14 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 27, 2014.|
|Jul 28 2014||Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed.|
|Aug 27 2014||Brief of respondents M. R., et ux., as Parents of E. R., a Minor in opposition filed.|
|Sep 10 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Sep 10 2014||Reply of petitioner Ridley School District filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 15 2014||Letter of September 15, 2014, received from counsel for petitioner. (Distributed)|
|Oct 6 2014||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Apr 10 2015||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Apr 28 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.|
|Apr 28 2015||Supplemental brief of petitioner Ridley School District filed. (Distributed)|
|May 18 2015||Petition DENIED.|
If you’re looking for an explainer of the 15 cases outstanding this term, look no further! Newly updated
via @AHoweBlogger 👇
There's an updated version -- now only 15 opinions to go! https://amylhowe.com/2021/06/18/reading-the-tea-leaves-remaining-cases-as-of-june-18/ https://twitter.com/aander1987/status/1406404952113790977
A surprising stat at this point in the term: Both Kagan and Breyer have been in the majority slightly more often than Alito.
Kavanaugh continues to have the highest rate (as he has for most of the term). Sotomayor has the lowest.
Still 15 cases left. So this could all change.
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Fulton quiets Tandon’s thunder: A free exercise puzzle - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. ...
Number of pages written by each justice in the five decisions handed down this week (majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents all included):
While today's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia is a win for a Catholic group seeking to participate in the city's foster program, it stops short of the broad endorsement of religious freedom the challengers had hoped for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis:
Court holds that city’s refusal to make referrals to faith-based agency violates Constitution - SCOTUSblog
In a clash between religious freedom and public policies that protect LGBTQ people, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday...
Now do we say that Sonia Sotomayor and the other liberals supported child slavery by all voting for Nestle today? Of course not. And Nestle’s lawyers like @Neal_katyal obviously don’t either. The cheap attacks on the court and thoughtful lawyers did not age well. -tg
The claim @nealkatyal was defending slavery is flat wrong & libelous. Here is what he actually said, which is the reverse: child slavery is abhorrent, criminal, horrific. Remember in a pending case he can't comment, so read what he really said in full.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.