|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1272||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether, under the doctrine of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, state anti-SLAPP (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation) statutes apply in federal diversity cases, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 2nd and 9th Circuits hold, or do not apply, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 10th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits hold.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 12 2020||Application (19A930) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 4, 2020 to April 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Feb 21 2020||Application (19A930) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until April 3, 2020.|
|May 04 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 8, 2020)|
|May 22 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Jason Lee Van Dyke to respond filed.|
|May 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||Response Requested. (Due July 8, 2020)|
|Jun 26 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Thomas Christopher Retzlaff|
|Jul 07 2020||Brief of respondent Jason Lee Van Dyke in opposition filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 16 Media Organizations and Advocacy Groups.|
|Jul 16 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from July 22, 2020 to August 5, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 17 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until August 5, 2020, granted.|
|Aug 04 2020||Reply of petitioner Thomas Christopher Retzlaff filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 13 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 16 Media Organizations and Advocacy Groups GRANTED.|
|Oct 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Biden's student-debt relief plan. The justices will hear oral argument in February. In the meantime, the plan remains blocked as a result of lower-court rulings.
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.