|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-801||Fed. Cir.||Oct 7, 2019||Dec 11, 2019||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2019|
Holding: The PTO cannot recover the salaries of its legal personnel under Section 145 of the Patent Act.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on December 11, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 04 2018||Application (18A369) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 25, 2018 to November 23, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Oct 05 2018||Application (18A369) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 23, 2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||Application (18A369) to extend further the time from November 23, 2018 to December 21, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Nov 14 2018||Application (18A369) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 21, 2018.|
|Dec 21 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)|
|Jan 22 2019||Brief of respondent NantKwest, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Reply of petitioner Andrei Iancu filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.|
|Mar 04 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2019||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Apr 03 2019||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits is granted. The time to file joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 17, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 15, 2019.|
|May 08 2019||Letter of substitution of petitioner received.|
|May 17 2019||Brief of petitioner Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office, filed.|
|May 17 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|May 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of R Street Institute filed.|
|May 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Federal Circuit Bar Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Jun 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed.|
|Jul 01 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, October 7, 2019.|
|Jul 15 2019||Brief of respondent NantKwest, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The American Bar Association filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amici curiae of The Association of Amicus Counsel, et al. filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The International Trademark Association filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Association of the Bar of the City of New York filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of IEEE-USA filed.|
|Aug 01 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 14 2019||Reply of petitioner Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 16 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.|
|Aug 27 2019||Complete record located on PACER (U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit and U.S.D.C. Eastern Dist, VA).|
|Oct 07 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Mr. Morgan Chu, Los Angeles, Cal.|
|Dec 11 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 13 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.