|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-399||D.C. Cir.||Apr 17, 2017||Jun 23, 2017||7-2||Ginsburg||OT 2016|
Holding: The proper review forum when the Merit Systems Protection Board dismisses a mixed case -- a complaint by an employee of a serious adverse employment action attributable, in whole or in part, to bias based on race, gender, age or disability -- on jurisdictional grounds is district court.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 23, 2017. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 27 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 27, 2016)|
|Oct 21 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2016.|
|Nov 14 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 5, 2016.|
|Dec 05 2016||Brief of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board in opposition filed.|
|Dec 20 2016||Reply of petitioner Anthony W. Perry filed.|
|Dec 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.|
|Jan 09 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 13, 2017.|
|Jan 13 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 14 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Feb 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, April 17, 2017.|
|Feb 22 2017||Record requested from U.S.C.A. for the D.C. Circuit.|
|Feb 27 2017||Record received from U.S.C.A. for the D.C. Circuit. The record is electronic.|
|Feb 27 2017||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Feb 27 2017||Brief of petitioner Anthony W. Perry filed.|
|Mar 03 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (MWELA) filed.|
|Mar 17 2017||Record received from the Merit Systems Protection Board (1 box).|
|Mar 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 29 2017||Brief of respondent Merit Systems Protection Board filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 10 2017||Reply of petitioner Anthony W. Perry filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 17 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Christopher Landau, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 23 2017||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined.|
|Aug 07 2017||Record from the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board has been returned.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...