|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-302||9th Cir. -||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issues: (1) Whether a court must defer to an agency's position under Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council when the only ambiguity is a direct conflict between two statutory sections, which the agency has not addressed; and (2) whether the Immigration and Nationality Act's asylum provision affords a noncitizen in reinstatement proceedings the opportunity to seek asylum in the United States.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 30 2017||Application (17A35) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2017 to August 24, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jul 07 2017||Application (17A35) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 24, 2017.|
|Aug 24 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2017)|
|Sep 19 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Rony E. Perez-Guzman on 09/19/2017|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amici curiae of Administrative Law and Statutory Interpretation Scholars filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of American Immigration Lawyers Association filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Immigration and International Law filed.|
|Oct 02 2017||Waiver of right of respondent Sessions, Att'y. Gen. to respond filed.|
|Oct 04 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.|
|Oct 11 2017||Response Requested. (Due November 13, 2017)|
|Nov 09 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 13, 2017.|
|Nov 13 2017||Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court’s Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system.|
|Dec 13 2017||Brief of respondent Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General in opposition filed.|
|Dec 21 2017||Reply of petitioner Rony E. Perez-Guzman filed.|
|Dec 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.|
|Jan 16 2018||Petition DENIED.|
Today, for the first time in 10 years, the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the Cameras in the Courtroom Act, which would require video recording of Supreme Court oral arguments and opinion announcements.
Text - S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
Text for S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.