|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-843||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether California’s Unsafe Handgun Act violates the Second Amendment by banning handguns of the kind in common use for traditional lawful purposes.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 16 2018||Application (18A178) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Aug 20 2018||Application (18A178) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 31, 2018.|
|Dec 28 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)|
|Jan 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2019 to March 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2019.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Professors of Second Amendment Law, et al. filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of States of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief of respondent Martin Horan, Director, California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms in opposition filed.|
|Mar 18 2019||Reply of petitioners Ivan Pena, et al. filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.