|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-992||Ark.||Not Argued||Jun 26, 2017||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2016|
Holding: Having chosen to make its birth certificates more than mere markers of biological relationships and to use them to give married parents a form of legal recognition that is not available to unmarried parents, Arkansas may not, consistent with Obergefell v. Hodges, deny married same-sex couples that recognition.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on June 26, 2017. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Alito joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 13 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 15, 2017)|
|Feb 24 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 14, 2017.|
|Mar 15 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Mar 15 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., et al.|
|Mar 15 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Family Equality Council, et al.|
|Mar 15 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Family Law Professors.|
|Apr 14 2017||Brief of respondent Nathaniel Smith in opposition filed.|
|May 1 2017||Reply of petitioners Marisa N. Pavan, et al. filed.|
|May 2 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.|
|May 22 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017.|
|May 22 2017||Record Requested .|
|May 23 2017||Record received from the Supreme Court of Arkansas. The record is electronic.|
|May 30 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017.|
|Jun 5 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017.|
|Jun 12 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017.|
|Jun 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 22, 2017.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Family Equality Council, et al., GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Family Law Professors GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., et al. GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and CASE REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Thomas and Justice Alito join, dissenting. (Detached Opinion).|
|Jul 28 2017||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jul 28 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster