Breaking News

Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, California

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1212 9th Cir. Not Argued Jun 28, 2021 9-0 Per Curiam OT 2020

Holding: Administrative exhaustion of state remedies is not a prerequisite for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim when the government has reached a conclusive position.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on June 28, 2021.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 26 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)
Mar 04 2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al.
Mar 18 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 23 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.
Apr 01 2021Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed.
Apr 01 2021Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.
Apr 02 2021Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
May 03 2021Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.
May 14 2021Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed)
May 18 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
Jun 01 2021Rescheduled.
Jun 07 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
Jun 08 2021Rescheduled.
Jun 14 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
Jun 21 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
Jun 28 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)