|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1098||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture’s jointly created core product may be condemned under the Sherman Act without requiring the plaintiff to establish that defendants harmed competition in a properly defined antitrust market; and (2) whether, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 27 2019||Application (19A606) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 8, 2020 to February 7, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 02 2019||Application (19A606) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 7, 2020.|
|Feb 07 2020||Motion (19M107) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.|
|Feb 07 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2020)|
|Feb 19 2020||MOTION (19M107) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion (19M107) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.|
|Apr 07 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. to respond filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law and Business School Professors and Economists filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Expert Antitrust Economists filed.|
|Apr 15 2020||Response Requested. (Due May 15, 2020)|
|Apr 23 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 15, 2020 to July 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 14, 2020.|
|Jul 14 2020||Brief of respondents Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 15 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from July 29, 2020 to August 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 17 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until August 12, 2020, granted.|
|Aug 11 2020||Reply of petitioners National Football League, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 12 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.|
|Oct 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.|
|Nov 02 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Statement of Justice Kavanaugh respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
We’ve gotten roughly half of the merits opinions for the term so far. Kavanaugh is trending as the median justice and appears to be supplanting Roberts.
Of course, that could all change by June. Here’s the first in a series on interim stats from the term.
On a new, conservative court, Kavanaugh sits at the center - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first in a series on interim statistics from the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. The Supreme Cou...
The Supreme Court will release orders and opinion(s?) on Monday May 17.
Order list at 9:30 a.m. EDT. Opinions at 10:00.
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.