|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1098||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture’s jointly created core product may be condemned under the Sherman Act without requiring the plaintiff to establish that defendants harmed competition in a properly defined antitrust market; and (2) whether, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 27 2019||Application (19A606) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 8, 2020 to February 7, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 02 2019||Application (19A606) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 7, 2020.|
|Feb 07 2020||Motion (19M107) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.|
|Feb 07 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 8, 2020)|
|Feb 19 2020||MOTION (19M107) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion (19M107) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.|
|Apr 07 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. to respond filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Law and Business School Professors and Economists filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||Brief amici curiae of Expert Antitrust Economists filed.|
|Apr 15 2020||Response Requested. (Due May 15, 2020)|
|Apr 23 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 15, 2020 to July 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 14, 2020.|
|Jul 14 2020||Brief of respondents Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 15 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from July 29, 2020 to August 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 17 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until August 12, 2020, granted.|
|Aug 11 2020||Reply of petitioners National Football League, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 12 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.|
|Oct 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.|
|Nov 02 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Statement of Justice Kavanaugh respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.