Multnomah County, Oregon v. Updike
Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2018Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17-1222 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2018 |
Issues: (1) Whether the level of discriminatory intent required to award compensatory damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, is “discriminatory animus,” as three circuits have held, or “deliberate indifference,” as five circuits have held; and (2) whether the provision of an effective accommodation can amount to discriminatory intent.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Feb 26 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2018) |
Mar 19 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2018 to May 2, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Mar 26 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 2, 2018. |
Apr 16 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 2, 2018 to June 1, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Apr 19 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 1, 2018. |
Jun 01 2018 | Brief of respondent David Updike in opposition filed. |
Jun 15 2018 | Reply of petitioner Multnomah County filed. |
Jun 20 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
Oct 01 2018 | Petition DENIED. |