|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1492||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether Washington’s compelling nonmember providers to accept a private organization as their exclusive representative for dealing with the state over public policy is one of the “other contexts” in which the “significant impingement on associational freedoms” is not tolerated by the First Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 24 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)|
|May 30 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Jay Inslee; Cheryl Strange; David Schumacher to respond filed.|
|May 30 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 to respond filed.|
|Jun 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 14 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jun 18 2019||Response Requested. (Due July 18, 2019)|
|Jun 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2019 to August 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 26 2019||Blanket Consent filed on behalf of Petitioner, and respondents.|
|Jul 02 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 27, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Jul 16 2019||Brief amici curiae of Buckeye Institute, et al., filed.|
|Jul 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Aug 27 2019||Brief of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 in opposition filed.|
|Aug 27 2019||Brief of respondents State of Washington in opposition filed.|
|Sep 10 2019||Reply of petitioner Katherine Miller filed.|
|Sep 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Oct 07 2019||Petition DENIED.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...