|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1351||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Issue: Whether the Medical Device Amendments to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempt a state-law claim alleging that a medical device manufacturer violated a duty under federal law to report adverse-event information to the Food and Drug Administration. CVSG: 10/07/2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 28 2013||Application (12A931) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 10, 2013 to June 9, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Apr 1 2013||Application (12A931) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 10, 2013.|
|May 10 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 13, 2013)|
|May 30 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 15, 2013.|
|Jun 10 2013||Brief amicus curiae of DRI -The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Jun 13 2013||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al filed.|
|Jun 13 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 15 2013||Brief of respondents Richard Stengel, and Mary Lou Stengel in opposition filed.|
|Jul 30 2013||Reply of petitioner Medtronic, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 31 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 20 2014||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|May 30 2014||Suggestion of death of respondent Richard Stengel filed by respondent Mary Lou Stengel.|
|Jun 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 3 2014||Response from petitioner Medtronic, Inc. to respondent's suggestion of death filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 3 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioner Medtronic, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 23 2014||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.