|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether, when a traffic officer smells the strong scent of raw marijuana emanating from a lawfully stopped car, the Fourth Amendment allows an officer to frisk a removed passenger for a weapon.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 23 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 24, 2017)|
|Jul 10 2017||Waiver of right of respondent Joseph Norman, Jr. to respond filed.|
|Jul 26 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.|
|Aug 01 2017||Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2017)|
|Aug 23 2017||Brief of respondent Joseph Norman, Jr. in opposition filed.|
|Sep 06 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Sep 07 2017||Reply of petitioner Maryland filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 02 2017||Petition DENIED.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.