|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-848||Md.||Not Argued||Oct 5, 2015||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2015|
Holding: An appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. Washington when it conducts a post-hoc assessment of trial counsel’s performance based on scientific advances not available at the time of trial.
Judgment: Reversed in a per curiam opinion on October 5, 2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 16 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2015)|
|Feb 6 2015||Waiver of right of respondent James Kulbicki to respond filed.|
|Feb 18 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 6, 2015.|
|Feb 19 2015||Response Requested . (Due March 23, 2015)|
|Mar 10 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 22, 2015.|
|Apr 20 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 6, 2015.|
|May 6 2015||Brief of respondent James Kulbicki in opposition filed.|
|May 26 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 11, 2015.|
|Jun 15 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2015.|
|Jun 22 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.|
|Jun 25 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015.|
|Sep 21 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 5 2015||Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Nov 6 2015||MANDATE ISSUED.|
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...
Tonight's ruling on the Trump Jan. 6 documents, explained.
BREAKING: Trump loses his bid at SCOTUS to block Congress from obtaining his White House records related to 1/6/21. Clarence Thomas is the lone public dissenter in the apparent 8-1 ruling.
#SCOTUS rejects request from former President Donald Trump to block the release of documents to committee investigating Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf