Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-848 | Md. | Not Argued | Oct 5, 2015 | n/a | Per Curiam | OT 2015 |
Holding: An appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. Washington when it conducts a post-hoc assessment of trial counsel’s performance based on scientific advances not available at the time of trial.
Judgment: Reversed in a per curiam opinion on October 5, 2015.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jan 16 2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2015) |
Feb 6 2015 | Waiver of right of respondent James Kulbicki to respond filed. |
Feb 18 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 6, 2015. |
Feb 19 2015 | Response Requested . (Due March 23, 2015) |
Mar 10 2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 22, 2015. |
Apr 20 2015 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 6, 2015. |
May 6 2015 | Brief of respondent James Kulbicki in opposition filed. |
May 26 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 11, 2015. |
Jun 15 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 18, 2015. |
Jun 22 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015. |
Jun 25 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015. |
Sep 21 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015. |
Oct 5 2015 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
Nov 6 2015 | MANDATE ISSUED. |
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/01/with-democrats-in-control-supreme-court-reform-proposals-reclaim-center-stage/
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/01/marriage-equality-and-sex.html
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
www.scotusblog.com
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.