|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-18||4th Cir.||Jun 20, 2019||7-2||Alito||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case.
Holding: The Bladensburg Cross does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 20, 2019. Justice Alito announced the judgment of the Supreme Court and delivered the opinion of the court with respect to Parts I, II–B, II–C, III, and IV, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A and II–D, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Kavanaugh joined. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined. Justice Kavanaugh filed a concurring opinion. Justice Kagan filed an opinion concurring in part. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Gorsuch filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 24 2018||Application (17A1175) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 30, 2018 to June 29, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|May 09 2018||Application (17A1175) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 29, 2018.|
|Jun 29 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)|
|Jul 12 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, The American Legion, The American Legion Department of Maryland, and The American Legion Colmar Manor Post 131.|
|Jul 13 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission.|
|Jul 25 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law & Justice filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 26 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Military Order of the Purple Heart filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. VIDED.(Corrected brief to be resubmitted)|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Retired Generals and Flag Officers filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Major General Patrick Brady and Veterans Groups Erecting and Maintaining War Memorials filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team of the Religious Freedom Institute filed. VIDED|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of 109 United States Senators and Members of the United States House of Representatives filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of State of West Virginia, 27 Other States & the Governor of Kentucky filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Maryland Elected Officials filed. VIDED|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Medal of Honor Recipients filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Town of Taos, New Mexico filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2018||Corrected brief amici curiae of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 01 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed.|
|Aug 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Prince George's County, Maryland filed.|
|Aug 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.|
|Aug 02 2018||Brief of respondents American Humanist Association, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of State of Maryland filed.|
|Aug 02 2018||Brief amici curiae of Veterans in Defense of Liberty, et al. filed.|
|Aug 21 2018||Reply of petitioner Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission filed.|
|Aug 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 02 2018||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 17-1717 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Nov 02 2018||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 17-1717. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 17-1717. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the flings is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Dec 21 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, February 27, 2019. VIDED.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Jan 15 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 27 2019||Argued. For petitioner in 18-18: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For petitioners in 17-1717: Michael A. Carvin, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae, supporting petitioners: Jeffrey B. Wall, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Monica L. Miller, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Jun 20 2019||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II–B, II–C, III, and IV, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A and II–D, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a concurring opinion. Kagan, J., filed an opinion concurring in part. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Gorsuch, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, J., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined. VIDED.|
|Jul 22 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.