|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1198||Cal. Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether a compulsory public-access easement of indefinite duration is a per se physical taking; and (2) whether applying the California Coastal Act to require the owner of private beachfront property to apply for a permit before excluding the public from its private property; closing or changing the hours, prices, or days of operation of a private business on its private property; or even declining to advertise public access to its private property, violates the takings clause, the due process clause, and/or the First Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 11 2018||Application (17A735) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2019 to February 22, 2019, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jan 12 2018||Application (17A735) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until February 22, 2018.|
|Feb 22 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2018)|
|Mar 06 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Martins Beach 1, LLC and Martins Beach 2, LLC.|
|Mar 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of California Business Properties Association filed.|
|Mar 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation and Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association filed.|
|Mar 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of California Association of Realtors, et al. filed.|
|Mar 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Apr 12 2018||Response Requested. (Due May 14, 2018)|
|Apr 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2018 to June 13, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 19 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 13, 2018.|
|Jun 13 2018||Brief of respondent Surfrider Foundation in opposition filed.|
|Jun 27 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Jun 27 2018||Reply of petitioners Martins Beach 1, LLC and Martins Beach 2, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 01 2018||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.