|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1284||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether federal courts can derive an implied exception to immunity for computer-service providers from most civil liability under Section 230(c)(2)(B) of the Communications Decency Act for blocking or filtering decisions when the decisions are alleged to be “driven by anticompetitive animus.”
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 06 2020||Application (19A993) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 30, 2020 to May 11, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Mar 09 2020||Application (19A993) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 11, 2020.|
|May 11 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2020)|
|May 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2020 to July 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 21 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.|
|May 22 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 27, 2020.|
|Jun 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of ESET, LLC filed.|
|Jun 12 2020||Brief amicus curiae of TechFreedom filed.|
|Jun 12 2020||Brief amici curiae of Cybersecurity Experts filed.|
|Jun 12 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Internet Association submitted.|
|Jul 27 2020||Brief of respondent Enigma Software Group USA, LLC in opposition filed.|
|Aug 12 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Aug 12 2020||Reply of petitioner Malwarebytes, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 22 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 05 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 13 2020||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Thomas respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf