|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-423||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit typical, law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense in any manner.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 11 2019||Application (19A59) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 28, 2019 to September 26, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 15 2019||Application (19A59) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 26, 2019.|
|Sep 26 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)|
|Oct 08 2019||Waiver of right of respondent William M. Pallozzi to respond filed.|
|Oct 08 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, William M. Pallozzi.|
|Oct 16 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Oct 18 2019||Response Requested. (Due November 18, 2019)|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition, et al. filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 18, 2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of State of Alabama as Amici Curiae,et al. filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||Brief of respondent William M. Pallozzi in opposition filed.|
|Jan 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Jan 08 2020||Reply of petitioners Brian Kirk Malpasso, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...