|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-423||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit typical, law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense in any manner.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 11 2019||Application (19A59) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 28, 2019 to September 26, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 15 2019||Application (19A59) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 26, 2019.|
|Sep 26 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)|
|Oct 08 2019||Waiver of right of respondent William M. Pallozzi to respond filed.|
|Oct 08 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, William M. Pallozzi.|
|Oct 16 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Oct 18 2019||Response Requested. (Due November 18, 2019)|
|Oct 30 2019||Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition, et al. filed.|
|Nov 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 18, 2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of State of Alabama as Amici Curiae,et al. filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||Brief of respondent William M. Pallozzi in opposition filed.|
|Jan 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Jan 08 2020||Reply of petitioners Brian Kirk Malpasso, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.