Lyft, Inc. v. California
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2024
Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law authorizing public officials to pursue claims for individualized monetary relief in court for the benefit of individuals who agreed to resolve those claims in arbitration, thereby circumventing those individuals’ arbitration agreements.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Apr 16 2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024) |
| May 08 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 09 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024, for all respondents. See Rule 30.1. |
| May 20 2024 | Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. |
| May 20 2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed. VIDED. |
| Jun 20 2024 | Brief of respondents California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| Jul 10 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
| Jul 10 2024 | Reply of petitioner Lyft, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 07 2024 | Petition DENIED. |
