|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-858||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that liability under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act may be premised on the filing of a proof of claim in bankruptcy and determined using a least-sophisticated consumer standard.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 26 2014||Application (14A564) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2014 to January 16, 2015, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Dec 3 2014||Application (14A564) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 16, 2015.|
|Jan 15 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2015)|
|Jan 31 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of eitiher party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioners LVNV Funding LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, and PRA Receivables Management, LLC|
|Feb 6 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 23, 2015.|
|Feb 16 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent|
|Feb 18 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Becket & Lee, LLP filed.|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amicus curiae of DBA International filed.|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Retail Collection Attorneys filed.|
|Feb 19 2015||Brief amicus curiae of ACA International filed.|
|Mar 17 2015||Brief of respondent Stanley Crawford in opposition filed.|
|Mar 31 2015||Reply of petitioners LVNV Funding, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Apr 1 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 17, 2015.|
|Apr 20 2015||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.