|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-820||2d Cir.||Dec 11, 2013||Mar 5, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2013|
Holding: The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction creates a near-automatic return remedy for children who have been abducted to another country. To invoke that return remedy, the parent seeking the child’s return must file a petition seeking the return within one year of the child’s abduction. After one year has passed, the Convention still directs the court to order the child’s return, “unless it is demonstrated that the child is settled in its new environment.” The Court holds that the one-year period may not be equitably tolled, even if the abducting parent has concealed the child’s whereabouts until after the one-year period has passed.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on March 5, 2014. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 2 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2013)|
|Feb 4 2013||Brief of respondent Diana Lucia Montoya Alvarez in opposition filed.|
|Feb 14 2013||Reply of petitioner Manuel Jose Lozano filed.|
|Feb 20 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013.|
|Mar 18 2013||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 24 2013||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||Supplemental brief of petitioner Manuel Jose Lozano filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.|
|Jun 24 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Jul 12 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 30, 2013.|
|Jul 12 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 22, 2013.|
|Aug 28 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Aug 30 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 30 2013||Brief of petitioner Manuel Jose Lozano filed.|
|Sep 4 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Mexican Association for Abducted and Missing Children in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 5 2013||Brief amici curiae of International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (IAML) filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 6 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Reunite International Child Abduction Centre in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 6 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Center for Missing and Exploited Children filed.|
|Sep 6 2013||Brief amici curiae of A Child Is Missing, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 11, 2013.|
|Sep 17 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 1 2013||Record received from U.S.C.A. for the Second Circuit - 1 envelope. The oral argument is electronic (Not on PACER).|
|Oct 1 2013||Additonal record received from the U.S.C.A. Second Circuit. (1 envelope containing SEALED documents.|
|Oct 22 2013||Brief of respondent Diana Lucia Montoya Alvarez filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 29 2013||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 29 2013||Brief amici curiae of Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment & Appeals Project (DV LEAP), et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Southern District of California is electronic.|
|Nov 18 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 21 2013||Reply of petitioner Manuel Jose Lozano filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York(1 Box / Part of the record is located on PACER).|
|Dec 11 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Shawn P. Regan, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Lauren A. Moskowitz, New York, N. Y.; and Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae).|
|Mar 5 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.|
|Apr 7 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Apr 8 2014||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York has been returned.|
|Apr 8 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. for the Second Circuit has been returned.|
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...
Tonight's ruling on the Trump Jan. 6 documents, explained.
BREAKING: Trump loses his bid at SCOTUS to block Congress from obtaining his White House records related to 1/6/21. Clarence Thomas is the lone public dissenter in the apparent 8-1 ruling.
#SCOTUS rejects request from former President Donald Trump to block the release of documents to committee investigating Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf