|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether a reasonable jury could find that officers used excessive force when they put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the ground and pressed into his back until he suffocated.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 17 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)|
|Oct 26 2020||Brief amici curiae of Policing Scholars filed.|
|Oct 26 2020||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Oct 26 2020||Brief of respondents City of St. Louis, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 26 2020||Brief amici curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Nov 10 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.|
|Nov 12 2020||Reply of petitioners Jody Lombardo, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 30 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 07 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.|
|Dec 07 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 04 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Jan 04 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 11 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.|
|Jan 11 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 19 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.|
|Jan 19 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 16 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 22 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.|
|Mar 01 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 15 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 22 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.|
|Mar 23 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 29 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.|
|Mar 29 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.|
|Apr 12 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 19 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.|
|Apr 21 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 26 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.|
|Apr 29 2021||Supplemental brief of petitioners Jody Lombardo, et al. filed.|
|May 10 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.|
|May 12 2021||Record Requested.|
|May 17 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.|
|May 20 2021||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit (1 box).|
|May 24 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.|
|Jun 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.|
|Jun 01 2021||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Missouri (1 envelope).|
|Jun 07 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.|
|Jun 14 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.|
|Jun 21 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
Today, for the first time in 10 years, the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the Cameras in the Courtroom Act, which would require video recording of Supreme Court oral arguments and opinion announcements.
Text - S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
Text for S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.