Lloyds Banking Group v. The Berkshire Bank
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant merely because the defendant’s alleged co-conspirator took foreseeable actions in the forum in furtherance of an alleged conspiracy, even though the defendant did not direct, control, or supervise the alleged co-conspirator.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| May 26 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2022) |
| Jun 16 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent The Berkshire Bank, et al. to respond filed. |
| Jun 22 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Jul 06 2022 | Response Requested. (Due August 5, 2022) |
| Jul 20 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2022 to September 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jul 21 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 1, 2022. |
| Aug 23 2022 | Brief of respondents The Berkshire Bank, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Sep 07 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| Sep 07 2022 | Reply of petitioners Lloyds Banking Group plc, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 03 2022 | Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice, Justice Kagan, and Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |
