|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1386||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether, in the absence of a Federal Communications Commission decision classifying Voice over Internet Protocol service as an information service, FCC policy can conflict with and pre-empt state regulation of VoIP service; and (2) whether VoIP service is a telecommunications service or an information service, under the appropriate functional test for classification determinations from National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 22 2019||Application (18A889) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 4, 2019 to May 3, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Mar 01 2019||Application (18A889) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until May 3, 2019.|
|May 01 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2019)|
|May 22 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2019 to July 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 23 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 3, 2019.|
|Jun 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners filed.|
|Jul 03 2019||Brief of respondents Charter Advanced Services (MN) LLC, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jul 12 2019||Reply of petitioners Dan M. Lipschultz, et al. filed.|
|Jul 17 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 25 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 03 2019||Letter of October 3, 2019 from counsel for petitioners filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 07 2019||Supplemental brief of respondents Charter Advanced Services (MN) LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 09 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Oct 21 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Gorsuch joins, concurring in the denial of certiorari. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. (Detached Opinion)|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...