|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-873||6th Cir.||Dec 3, 2013||Mar 25, 2014||9-0||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: Static Control has adequately pleaded the elements of a Lanham Act cause of action for false advertising: an injury to a commercial interest in sales or business reputation proximately caused by the defendant’s misrepresentation.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 25, 2014.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 14 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 15, 2013)|
|Feb 15 2013||Waiver of right of respondent Static Control Components, Inc. to respond filed.|
|Feb 27 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013.|
|Mar 1 2013||Response Requested . (Due April 1, 2013)|
|Mar 25 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 1, 2013.|
|May 1 2013||Brief of respondent Static Control Components, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|May 10 2013||Reply of petitioner Lexmark International, Inc. filed.|
|May 14 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 30, 2013.|
|Jun 3 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 5 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jun 20 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of niether party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 21 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 16, 2013.|
|Jun 21 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 15, 2013.|
|Aug 16 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 16 2013||Brief of petitioner Lexmark International, Inc. filed.|
|Aug 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Aug 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Aug 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 17 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday December 3, 2013|
|Sep 17 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 19 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 6th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 15 2013||Brief of respondent Static Control Components, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 17 2013||Brief amicus curiae of International Trademark Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2013||Reply of petitioner Lexmark International, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of Kentucky is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 3 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Steven B. Loy, Lexington, Ky. For respondent: Jameson R. Jones, Denver, Colo.|
|Jan 17 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Kentucky. The record is electronic (Not on PACER).|
|Mar 25 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 28 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 1 2014||Record returned for U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Kentucky.|
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722
Today's big cert grant in a TikTok minute.
In a unanimous ruling, SCOTUS revives a lawsuit against Northwestern University under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Current and former employees argue that the university is violating its fiduciary duties in the administration of its retirement investment plans.