Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-1276 | 11th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2019 |
Issue: Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. Β§ 2255 is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, when the record is silent as to whether the district court based its original judgment on that provision or another provision of the same statute.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Apr 05 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2019) |
Apr 18 2019 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
Apr 30 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019. |
May 06 2019 | Response Requested. (Due June 5, 2019) |
May 29 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2019 to July 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
May 31 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2019. |
Jul 05 2019 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Jul 24 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019. |
Jul 24 2019 | Reply of petitioner Andrew Levert filed. (Distributed) |
Oct 07 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019. |
Oct 15 2019 | Petition DENIED. |
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are βIndian Tribesβ for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLawβs Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations β special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
www.scotusblog.com
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. Weβre still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
www.scotusblog.com
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _π©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ_ Register here β‘οΈ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.