|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-581||2d Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit erred in holding – in direct conflict with the decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 3rd and 9th Circuits – that Item 303 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K creates a duty to disclose that is actionable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 31 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2016)|
|Nov 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed.|
|Nov 30 2016||Waiver of right of respondent Indiana Public Retirement System, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 30 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Dec 07 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.|
|Dec 08 2016||Response Requested. (Due January 9, 2017)|
|Dec 16 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 8, 2017.|
|Feb 08 2017||Brief of respondents Indiana Public Retirement System, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 21 2017||Reply of petitioner Leidos, Inc., fka SAIC, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 17, 2017.|
|Mar 20 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 24, 2017.|
|Mar 27 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 08 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 21, 2017.|
|May 08 2017||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 31, 2017.|
|Jun 20 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the Petitioner and the Respondent.|
|Jun 21 2017||Joint appendix filed (3 Volumes). (Statement of costs filed).|
|Jun 21 2017||Brief of petitioner Leidos, Inc., fka SAIC, Inc. filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amici curiae of The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The Business Roundtable filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The Society for Corporate Governance filed.|
|Jun 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Aug 31 2017||Brief of respondents IN Public Retirement, System et al. filed.|
|Aug 31 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 6, 2017.|
|Sep 07 2017||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Sep 07 2017||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 07 2017||Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors filed.|
|Sep 07 2017||Brief amici curiae of Professors at Law and Business Schools filed.|
|Sep 07 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 12 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.|
|Sep 15 2017||Records received from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 02 2017||Reply of petitioner Leidos, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 06 2017||Motion of the parties to remove the case from the argument calendar and hold in abeyance any further proceedings filed.|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 17 2017||The joint motion to remove the case from the argument calendar and hold in abeyance any further proceedings GRANTED.|
|Oct 17 2017||This case is removed from the argument calendar for Monday, November 6, 2017.|
|Jun 18 2018||Stipulation to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.|
|Jun 18 2018||Case Dismissed - Rule 46.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.