|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether the Constitution permits the court-martial of a retired military service member; and (2) whether, if so, the Constitution limits the jurisdiction of courts-martial in such cases to offenses that are related to the retiree’s military status.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 14 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)|
|Sep 19 2018||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Sep 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 03 2018||Response Requested. (Due November 2, 2018)|
|Oct 24 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 25 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.|
|Nov 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 3, 2018 to January 2, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 2, 2019.|
|Jan 02 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2019 to January 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 03 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 9, 2019.|
|Jan 09 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jan 16 2019||Reply of petitioner Steven M. Larrabee filed.|
|Jan 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||Petition DENIED.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/