Korf v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether the attorney-client privilege and work-product protection established in United States v. Zolin prevent a court from allowing a “filter team” of Department of Justice attorneys to review assertedly privileged materials of petitioners’ lawyers, seized during a search, before any court ruled on petitioners’ assertions of attorney-client privilege and work-product protection and without requiring any showing that an exception to privilege may apply.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Apr 18 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2022) |
May 13 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2022 to June 20, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
May 16 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 21, 2022. See Rule 30.1. |
May 20 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. |
May 20 2022 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Criminal Law and Legal Ethics filed. |
Jun 14 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2022 to July 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jun 15 2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 21, 2022. |
Jul 21 2022 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Aug 08 2022 | Reply of petitioners Mordechai Korf, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Aug 10 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
Oct 03 2022 | Petition DENIED. |