|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-184||8th Cir.||Oct 2, 2012||Dec 10, 2012||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: A federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in 5 U.S.C. § 7702(a)(1) should seek judicial review in district court, rather than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, regardless whether the MSPB decided her case on procedural grounds or on the merits.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on December 10, 2012.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 11 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2011)|
|Aug 31 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 14, 2011.|
|Oct 12 2011||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 14, 2011.|
|Nov 10 2011||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 14, 2011.|
|Dec 14 2011||Brief of respondent Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor in opposition filed.|
|Dec 28 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 13, 2012.|
|Dec 28 2011||Reply of petitioner Carolyn M. Kloeckner filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 13 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 24 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including March 28, 2012.|
|Feb 24 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 30, 2012.|
|Mar 28 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Mar 28 2012||Brief of petitioner Carolyn M. Kloeckner filed.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 13, 2012.|
|Jul 13 2012||Brief of respondent Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor filed.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 2, 2012|
|Jul 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 31 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 8th Circuit. (1 envelope)|
|Aug 13 2012||Reply of respondent Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 23 2012||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of Missouri is electronic.|
|Oct 2 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Eric Schnapper, Seattle, Wash. For respondent: Sarah E. Harrington, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 10 2012||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 11 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|May 8 2013||Record returned to U.S.C.A. for 8th Circuit.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.