|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-301||7th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2017|
Issues: (1) Whether a school policy requiring boys and girls to use separate bathroom facilities that correspond to their biological sex is sex stereotyping that constitutes discrimination “based on sex” in violation of Title IX; and (2) whether a school policy requiring boys and girls to use separate bathroom facilities that correspond to their biological sex is a sex-based classification triggering heightened scrutiny under an Equal Protection analysis.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 25 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2017)|
|Aug 28 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Kenosha Unified School District No. 1 Board of Education, et al. on 09/13/2017|
|Sep 14 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 27, 2017.|
|Sep 26 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed.|
|Sep 26 2017||Brief amici curiae of Michigan Association of Christian Schools, et al. filed.|
|Sep 26 2017||Brief amici curiae of Family Research Council, et al. filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Alliance Defending Freedom filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Concerned Women for America filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amicus curiae of William J. Bennett filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amici curiae of Public Advocate of the United States, et al. filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||Brief amici curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, et al. filed.|
|Oct 16 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 27, 2017.|
|Nov 09 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 27, 2017.|
|Dec 18 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 27, 2017 to January 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 20 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 26, 2018.|
|Jan 23 2018||Motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 46 filed by petitioner Kenosha Unified School District No. 1 Board of Education, et al.|
|Mar 05 2018||Response to motion to dismiss from respondent Ashton Whitaker filed.|
|Mar 05 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...