Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

Since October, SCOTUSblog has been outside the Supreme Court collecting data and stories from people who traveled to see oral arguments in person during the 2019 term. Click to follow along with the month-long release of our Courtroom Access project.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Gee

Application for a stay granted, and mandate of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in case No. 17-30397 stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, on February 7, 2019
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18A774 5th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2018

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jan 28 2019Application (18A774) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Alito.
Jan 29 2019Response to application (18A774) requested by Justice Alito, due Thursday, January 31, 2019, by 3:00 p.m. ET.
Jan 31 2019Response to application from respondent Rebekah Gee, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals filed.
Feb 01 2019Reply of applicants June Medical Services, L.L.C., et al. filed.
Feb 01 2019Because the filings regarding the application for a stay in this matter were not completed until earlier today and the Justices need time to review these filings, the issuance of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 17-30397, is administratively stayed through Thursday, February 7, 2019. This order does not reflect any view regarding the merits of the petition for a writ of certiorari that applicants represent they will file.
Feb 07 2019Application (18A774) referred to the Court.
Feb 07 2019Application (18A774) granted by the Court. The application for a stay presented to JUSTICE ALITO and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in case No. 17-30397 is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. JUSTICE THOMAS, JUSTICE ALITO, JUSTICE GORSUCH, and JUSTICE KAVANAUGH would deny the application. JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, dissenting from grant of application for stay. (Detached Opinion)
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards